Rasio Fraksi Debu-Liat Sebagai Indikator Perkembangan dan Kesuburan Tanah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/jsolum.19.1.24-33.2022
Muhammad Nuriman * (Universitas Tanjungpura)
Rini Hazriani (aDosen Jurusan Ilmu Tanah, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tanjungpura)
Tri Tiana Ahmadi Putri (Peneliti, CV. Sky Agro Energy Pontianak)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Soil horizon development is a determinant of soil type and characteristics. The morphology reflects the stages of soil formation by observing the genetic horizon. The genetic horizon is a soil layer distinguished by symbols (O, A, E, B, C, and R). Soil formation can also be obtained from the silt-clay fraction as part of the soil texture observation. The silt-clay ratio can reflect the soil morphology and genesis. This study aimed to determine the silt-clay ratio as an indicator of soil development and fertility. This study was conducted in 2020 in Manismata Sub-District West Kalimantan Province with soil parent material derived from sedimentary rocks with the topography of 0-3%, 3-8%, and 8-15%. The observations were carried out on five soil profiles in terms of morphology, texture, organic matter, nitrogen, CEC, and Ca. Based on the results, entisol (regosol) had A-C genetic horizon and silt-clay ratio >2.73. Meanwhile, inceptisol (kambisol) had an A-B-C genetic horizon and a silt-clay ratio of 1.44 – 2.24. The silt-clay ratio in entisol had a significant influence on organic matter, CEC, and Ca of 75.79%, 86.98%, and 85.14%, respectively. Silt-clay ratio in inceptisol had a significant influence on organic matter, CEC, and Nitrogen. 3-8% inceptisol had a negative relationship of 67.25%, 52.33% and 84.59%, respectively. Meanwhile, 8-15% of Kambisol had a positive relationship with R2 of 69.08%, 54.49%, and 66.61%, respectively. The difference in the relationship (negative, positive) on inceptisol was due to 3-8% inceptisols having lithologic discontinuities. Thus, it can be concluded that the silt-clay ratio can be an indicator of soil development and fertility.
Key words : Fertility, Morphogenesis, Silt/Clay, Soil Weathering
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayolagha, G. A. 2007. Survey and classification of Yenagoa-Meander Belt soils in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Acta Agronomica Nigeriana, 7(2), 141-147.
Balai Penelitian Tanah. 2009. Petunjuk Teknis: Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk. Bogor (ID): Balai Penelitian Tanah.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 1990. Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend, World Soil Resources Report, FAO Rome 119 pp.
Hamdan dan Bumham. 1996. The contribution of nutrients from parent material in three deeply weathered soils of Peninsular Malaysia. Geoderma. Volume 74, Issues 3–4, December 1996, Pages 219-233.
Hardjowigeno, S. 2007. Ilmu Tanah. Akademika Pressindo. Cetakan keenam. Jakarta.
Mohamed, S.H, B.M. Msanya, H.J. Tindwa, , Semu E. 2021. Pedological Characterization and Classification of Selected Soils of Morogoro and Mbeya Regions of Tanzania. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management. Vol. 6, No. 2, 2021, pp. 79-92. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.17
Ngongo L, R. Langohr 1992. Classifying Strongly Weathered Soil From The Zairian Basin Into The Revised International Soil Classification System (Soil Taxonomy, 1990; FAO-UNESCO legend, 1988). Pedologie, XLII-2, p. 99-117, 5 tab., 1 fig., Gent. Belgium.
Nwokocha, C.C., F.O.R Akamigbo, and G.O. Chukwu, 2003. Characterization and evaluation of soils of Umuahia north local government area of Abia State, for agricultural production. In Ojeniyi et al., (Eds.), Land degradation, Agricultural Productivity and Rural Poverty: Environmental implications. Proceedings of the 28th Annual conference of the SSSN 4-7 November, 2003 Umudike-Nigeria, pp. 308-315.
Rayes, L. M. 2017. Morfologi dan Klasifikasi Tanah. UB Press. Malang.
Schoeneberger, P.J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, and Soil Survey Staff. 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.
Soil Survey Staff. 2009. Soil Survey Field and Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 51, Version 1.0. R. Burt (ed.). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy (12rd ed.). United States Department of Agriculture.
Subardja, D., S. Ritung, M. Anda, Sukarman, E. Suryani, dan R.E. Subandiono. 2016. Petunjuk Teknis Klasifikasi Tanah Nasional. Edisi Ke-2. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor. 60 hal.
Subowo, G. 2010. Strategi Efisiensi Penggunaan Bahan Organik Untuk Kesuburan Dan Produktivitas Tanah Melalui Pemberdayaan Sumberdaya Hayati Tanah. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan Vol. 4 No. 1. ISSN 1907-0799.
Uwingabire, S, B.M. Msanya, P.W. Mtakwa, P. Uwitonze, and S.N Sirikare. 2016. Pedological characterization of soils developed on gneissic - Granites in the congo nile watershed divide and central plateau zones, Rwanda. International Journal of Current Research, 8, (09), 39489-395
Yakubu M, Ojanuga. 2013. Pedogenesis, Weathering Status and Mineralogy Of The Soils On Ironstone Plateaux (Laterites), Sokoto Nigeria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6(2): 93 – 100.
Zainuddin, R. 2015. Genesis dan Klasifikasi Tanah yang Berkembang di Atas Batuan Induk Granit di Taman Nasional Lore Lindu. J. Agroland 22 (3): 175 – 187.
Article Metrics
This article has been read : 1834 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded : 0 times
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Nuriman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
